Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 ARK 507 - Williams v. Williams

Williams v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
October 1982
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Petty v. State · St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Kilpatrick · Mutual Life Insurance v. Parrish · McDonald v. Daniel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... If the jury was permitted to separate by the court, the jurors would necessarily speak to persons with whom they came in contact. If they violated the admonition of the court not to speak about the case, the burden of showing that fact would be upon the defendant, and he has not attempted to show that the conversation that the juror had in any wise pertained to the case which the jury had under consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.