Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 ARK 63 - Chalmers & Son v. Bowen

Chalmers & Son v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
December 1993
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 1993

3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

50191419201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Oak Leaf Mill Co. v. Cooper · Brown v. Brown · McDermott v. Kimball Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A principal is not only bound by the acts of the agent done under express authority, but he is also bound by all acts of a general agent which are within the apparent scope of his authority, whether they have been authorized by the principal or not, and even if they are contrary to express directions. The principal in such case is not only bound by the authority actually given to the general agent, but by the authority which the third person dealing with him has a right to believe has been given to him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.