Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 CAL 333 - People v. Smith

People v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
10
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably People v. Foster (1926), People v. Armstrong (1896)

26 state decisions — followed in 10 states

601896190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Leong Quong · People v. Wallace · Hunt v. State · People v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When an offense involves the commission of, or an attempt to commit, a private injury, and is described with sufficient certainty in other respects to identify the act, an erroneous allegation as to the person injured, or intended to be injured, is not material.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.