Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 Cal. App. 2d 456 - Crabbe v. Mires

112 Cal. App. 2d 456 - Crabbe v. Mires’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2008

18 state decisions

100195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dickerson v. Colgrove · Seymour v. Oelrichs · Carpy v. Dowdell · 17 Cal. App. 212 - Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co. · Gaine v. Austin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When damages are capable of ascertainment by calculation or by reference to well-established market values, together with computation, interest is allowable from the time the damages fall due.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.