People v. Werwee’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 1991 · most notably 256 Cal. App. 2d 623 - People v. Dominguez (1967), 41 Cal. 3d 353 - People v. Deere (1985)
3 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Maughs · People v. Martin · People v. Diaz · People v. Cord · 26 Cal. 2d 696 - McDowd v. Pig'n Whistle Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Although a defendant may waive rights which exist for his own benefit, he may not waive those which belong also to the public generally.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We adopt this view because of the inherent difficulty in obtaining reliable information on whether there has been misconduct. “When there has been a prolonged separation, during which jurors moved about at will, affidavits or testimony of the jurors that they had not discussed the case or been guilty of other misconduct would be a mere formality, and not capable of refutation by the accused. To give such evidence effect as proof of absence of prejudice, against a helpless defendant, would be as illogical as to give the same effect to the presumption that the jurors had faithfully performed their duties.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lowery v. State“If it should be contended that a defendant under such circumstances waived his right to claim irregularity in the separation of the jury by consenting to it, our answer would be that he could not waive the right to have the statutory procedure observed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.