112 Cal. App. 4th 675 - Sheyko v. Saenz’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 7 U.S.C. § 2011 (Charitable Assistance and Food Bank Act of 1987) · 7 U.S.C. § 2012 · 7 U.S.C. § 2014 · 7 U.S.C. § 2015 · 7 U.S.C. § 2020
Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Dandridge v. Williams · 45 Cal. 3d 727 - Lungren v. Deukmejian · 19 Cal. 4th 1 - Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of Equalization · Bowen v. Roy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[s]hall' is mandatory and 'may' is permissive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.