Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 Colo. 363 - Rosane v. Senger

Rosane v. Senger’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

122
cited by 122 later decisions
13
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 10 district · 104 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 122 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Fernandi v. Strully (1961), Ohio v. Peterson (1981)

4 federal appellate · 10 district · 104 state decisions — followed in 13 states

290194419501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schloendorff v. Society of the New York Hospital · Hahn v. Claybrook · Hudson v. Moore · Stacy v. Williams · Burke v. Syracuse Auto Rental & Taxicab Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 122 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[a] hospital, a corporation as here, can not be licensed to, and can not practice medicine and surgery. The relation between doctor and patient is personal. That a hospital employs doctors on its staff does not make it liable for the discharge of their professional duty since it is powerless, under the law, to command or forbid any act by them in the practice of their profession. Unless it employs those whose want of skill is known, or should be known, to it, or by some special conduct or neglect makes itself responsible for their malpractice ... it cannot be held liable therefor.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] legal right to damage for an injury is property and one can not [sic] be deprived of his property without due process. There can be no due process unless the party deprived has his day in court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “enacted for the purpose of promoting justice, discouraging unnecessary delay and forestalling the prosecution of stale claims, not for the benefit of the negligent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.