Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 Conn. 498 - Eberich v. Solomon

Eberich v. Solomon’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
5
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2006

13 state decisions

4019311940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. . Townsend · Kirk v. VanPetten · J. N. Harshaw v. . Wm. F. McKesson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of acceleration clause in a mortgage is to protect the mortgagee from loss or impairment of his security. A majority of the courts accordingly hold that, though there has been a failure to pay taxes or assessments when due, if payment or tender is made before foreclosure is started, it will bar the right to foreclosure because of such failure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.