112 Conn. App. 160 - Stuart v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Stuart v. Stuart (2010), Kaczynski v. Kaczynski (2009)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dunham v. Dunham · Santopietro v. City of New Haven · Alaimo v. Royer · Saphir v. Neustadt · In Re FP
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's application of the `clear and convincing' standard of proof to claims brought pursuant to General Statutes § 52-564?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stuart v. Stuart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.