Randerson v. Ball

Decided January 14, 1902.)

First Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1902-01-14

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Rhode Island. In Admiralty. Suit for towage services and cross libel for damages.</p>

1 counsel of record

Relies on Ball v. Randerson

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1902-01-14

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Rhode Island. In Admiralty. Suit for towage services and cross libel for damages.

¶2For opinion below, see 111 Fed. 212.

¶3Worthington Frothingham (Adoniram J. Cushing, on the brief), for appellant. Frank Elealy (Archibald C. Mntteson, on the brief), for appellees.

¶4Bef; re COLT, Circuit Judge, and WEBB and ALDRICH, District Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6In this case we are all of opinion that there is no ground .for disturbing either the rulings or the findings of the court below, and *1023therefore the decree of that court should be affirmed. The decree of the district court is affirmed, with interest, and the costs of appeal aro awarded to the appellees.