Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 F.1d 663 - In re Beerman

In re Beerman’s Empirical Analysis

112 F. 663 · 1901

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
October 1961
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1961

3 federal appellate · 4 district ·

601901191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"li transactions of this sort are to be permitted, then, instead of a creditor taking a mortgage himself, when a debtor is in failing circumstances, he will get some one else to advance the money, agreeing that the person advancing the money shall suffer no toss and thereby obtain by indirection a preference which he would be unable to get if he had acted directly with the debtor, provided, of course, that the debtor within four months thereafter becomes a bankrupt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.