Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 F.2d 126 - Carpenter v. Hudspeth

Carpenter v. Hudspeth’s Empirical Analysis

112 F.2d 126 · 1940

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
September 1959
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Burton v. United States · Morgan v. Devine · Krueger v. United States · Chrysler v. Zerbst · Reger v. Hudspeth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““And proof of having possession of the stolen merchandise at a subsequent time and different place from its theft, with knowledge that it had been stolen, was sufficient to support conviction [on the possession count]. One defendant receiving it from another could have been convicted on such proof even though he did not take part in breaking the seal, entering the car, or committing the larceny. It is manifest that the several counts each charged a separate and distinct crime, entirely apart from the others.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.