Leonard v. Nairn’s Empirical Analysis
112 F.2d 315 · 1940
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1985
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 108 · 7 U.S.C. § 6D
Relies on Board of Trade v. Christie Grain & Stock Co. · Richardson v. Shaw · Schuyler v. Littlefield · Gorman v. Littlefield · Thomas v. Taggart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have stated in the opinion that the same law applying to stock broker [sic] bankruptcies should apply to grain broker bankruptcies. The instant case arose prior to the Chandler Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 96 , sub. e (Supp. 1938), so we must keep in mind that the analogous law applicable here is the law pertaining to stock broker bankruptcies prior to the Chandler Act. .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.