Farley v. Albers’s Empirical Analysis
112 F.2d 401 · 1940
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1977
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 321 (§ 9 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913) · 12 U.S.C. § 332 (§ 9 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913)
Relies on Belknap v. Schild · Texas Pac Ry Co v. Pottorff · Lewis v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. · United States ex rel. Goldberg v. Daniels · State of Oregon v. Ethan a Hitchcock a
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Taken as a whole, the system constitutes a part of both the postal and fiscal operations of the government. Profits are- treated, as postal revenue, and the fund is held in reserve for emergency-use of the government and to facilitate government refinancing operations by the purchase of government bonds. It is safeguarded as other public moneys, and the obligation to the depositors is the pledge of the United States.” 112 F.2d page 402.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.