Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 F.2d 603 - Creech v. Hudspeth

Creech v. Hudspeth’s Empirical Analysis

112 F.2d 603 · 1940

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
November 1961
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 1961

19 federal appellate ·

150194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 'The Ku-Klux Cases' Yarbrough · Knewel v. Egan · Ex Parte Tobias Watkins · Krueger v. United States · Coy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If there is a federal offense which the indictment apparently attempts to charge, and the court has jurisdiction over such offense and over the person of the accused, the sufficiency of the indictment is not open to challenge on habeas corpus.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.