Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 F.2d 838 - In re Gregory

In re Gregory’s Empirical Analysis

112 F.2d 838 · 1940

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
June 1948
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on In re Beplate · In re Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““19. In an animated advertising device, the combination of a ratable shaft, a display arm fixed to said shaft, and means to impart to said shaft an oscillatory movement comprising a pendulum attached to said shaft having a sector shaped armature, a solenoid cooperating with said armature, and means for intermittently opening, and closing the circuit through the solenoid to cause said pendulum and said display arm to oscillate. “20. In an animated advertising device, the combination of a pivoting support, a display arm carried by said support, and means to impart to said display arm an oscillatory movement comprising a pendulum carried by said pivoting support havingo a sector-shaped armature, a solenoid cooperating with said armature and means for intermittently opening and closing the circuit through said solenoid to cause said pendulum ■ and said display arm to oscillate.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.