Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 F.2d 897 - Hayes v. Kelley

Hayes v. Kelley’s Empirical Analysis

112 F.2d 897 · 1940

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1966
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wills v. Nehalem Coal Co. · Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co. · Voellmeck v. Harding · Rugger v. Mt. Hood Electric Co. · Enyart v. Merrick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Upon motion of a party made not later than ten days after entry of judgment the court may amend its findings or make additional findings and may amend the judgment accordingly.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.