Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 F.3d 191 - Siglar II v. Hightower

Siglar II v. Hightower’s Empirical Analysis

112 F.3d 191 · 1997

Citation profile

206
cited by 206 later decisions
April 2024
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 206 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Geiger v. Jowers (2005), Mitchell v. Horn (2003)

40 federal appellate · 9 district ·

12201997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neitzke v. Williams · Hudson v. McMillian · Spears v. Ol McCotter · Eason v. Thaler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 206 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No federal civil action may be brought by a prisoner confined in a jail, prison, or other correctional facility, for mental or emotional injury suffered while in custody without a prior showing of physical injury.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment excludes from constitutional recognition de minimis uses of physical force, provided that the use of force is not of a sort “repugnant to the conscience of mankind.” In the absence of any definition of “physical injury” in the new statute, we hold that the well established Eighth Amendment standards guide our analysis in determining whether a prisoner has sustained the necessary physical injury to support a claim for mental or emotional suffering. That is, the injury must be more than de minimus, but need not be significant.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment excludes from constitutional recognition de minimis uses of physical force, provided that the use of force is not of a sort 'repugnant to the conscience of mankind.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.