Channer v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
112 F.3d 214 · 1997
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2018
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Griffin v. Breckenridge · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer · Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. · Civil Rights Cases
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“assume, arguendo, that the Thirteenth Amendment directly gives rise to a cause of action for damages under the analysis articulated in Bivens.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the federal government is entitled to require a communal contribution by an [immigration] detainee in the form of housekeeping tasks.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because we hold that Channer's Thirteenth Amendment rights were not violated, we do not reach the issue of qualified immunity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.