Advent Electronics, Inc. v. Buckman’s Empirical Analysis
112 F.3d 267 · 1997
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2011
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis · Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & Co. · American Hospital Supply Corp. v. Hospital Products Ltd. · Sarnoff v. American Home Products Corp. · Original Great American Chocolate Chip Cookie Co. v. River Valley Cookies, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether to enter a preliminary injunction, a district court should consider: whether there is a reasonable likelihood that plaintiff will prevail at trial; whether the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law or will be irreparably harmed if the injunction is not issued; whether the threatened injury to the plaintiff outweighs the threatened harm the injunction may inflict on the defendant; and whether the granting of the preliminary injunction will deserve the public interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“discretionary acts of weighing evidence or balancing equitable factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.