Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 F.3d 322 - Berg v. Bruce

Berg v. Bruce’s Empirical Analysis

112 F.3d 322 · 1997

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Montandon v. Farmland Industries, Inc. (1997), Helfter v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (1997)

16 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

180199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 631 (§ 12 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Connick v. Myers · Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unlawful for an employer to discriminate against any of his employees ... because such individual ... has opposed any practice made unlawful by this section, or ... participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or litigation under this chapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.