United States v. Pineyro’s Empirical Analysis
112 F.3d 43 · 1997
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably UNITED STATES of America, v. Frank SERAFINI; United States of America, v. Frank Serafini (2000), Francisco Rios v. Ron Wiley Ron Wiley (2000)
21 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3584 · 18 U.S.C. § 3585 · 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States v. Wilson · Barden v. Keohane · United States v. Lussier · United States v. Keller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to determine when a sentence is deemed to 'commence'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“non-binding recommendation does not fit within the class of final orders appealable either under 28 U.S.C. 1291 (final decisions of district courts) or 18 U.S.C. 3742 (final sentencing orders)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it falls to BOP, not the district judge, to determine ... whether the defendant should receive credit for time spent in custody before the sentence 'commenced'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.