Tyler v. O'Neill’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Buckhannon Board and Care Home Incs v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources · Mims v. Browning Manufacturing · Institutionalized Juveniles S v. Secretary of Public Welfare C 83-1696 83-1722 · In Re: Nvr, Lp, Debtor · Tsu v. Tracy Federal Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a defendant successfully defends against a plaintiff's substantial claims and judgment is entered accordingly, the defendant is generally considered the prevailing party.”). . Even given that certain indicia of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Keister v. PPL Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.