¶1 This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
112 Fla. 108
150 So 136
Chitty v. Smith
Decided September 25, 1933
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1933-09-25
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1933-09-25
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 1986 · most notably 95 So. 2d 912 - De Groot v. Sheffield (1957), 19 Cal. 2d 831 - Laisne v. California State Board of Optometry (1942)
1 district · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →