Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

112 Fla. 399

150 So 611

Ceraolo v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 19, 1933

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1933-10-19

Relies on Sherman and Sherman v. Myers

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1933-10-19

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1963

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

501933194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 In proceedings to enforce a mortgage lien upon real estate given to secure the payment of a negotiable promissory note for $5000.00 payable in three years with interest at 8% per annum, the Chancellor found in effect that under Sections 6936 (4851), 6939 (4852), Compiled General Laws, 1927, the note secured by the mortgage is usurious in that the actual amount loaned was $4500.00, *400 $500 having been reserved as a bonus'. Amounts totaling $1000.00 were reserved or paid as interest. The decree com tains the following:

¶2 “Amounts actually loaned by Smith to Ceraolo $4500.00

¶3 Attorney’s fees'__________________________ 250.00

¶4 $4750100

¶5 Less double the amount of interest actually paid by the Mortgagor------------------ 2000.00

¶6 net amount due $2750.00”

¶7 A decree was rendered against the mortgagor for $2700.00. Defendant appealed claiming a larger forfeiture for the usury.

¶8 The amounts that under the statute should for the usury be forfeited and deducted from the amount actually loaned are double the $500.00 res'erved by the lender but included in the note, and also double the $1000.00 actually reserved by or paid to the mortgagee as interest, making a total of $3000.00 to be deducted from the $4500.00 actually loaned to and received by the mortgagor. Sherman v. Myers, 108 Fla. 129, 146 So. 213. The opinion in Sherman v. Myers was filed in this Court after the decree herein was rendered in the circuit court.

¶9 The amount allowed for attorney fees should have appropriate relation to the amount recoverable.

¶10 Revers'ed for appropriate decree.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
/112/fla/399 · .json · Public domain