Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 F. Supp. 2d 355 - Strougo v. Bassini

112 F. Supp. 2d 355 - Strougo v. Bassini’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 80A

Relies on Burks v. Lasker · Auerbach v. Bennett · Boston Firefighters Union, Local 718 v. Boston Chapter · Panter v. Marshall Field & Co. · Joy v. North

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “) in these actions. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted and settlement is approved, as well as the application for an award of attorneys' fees and compensation to Strougo. Prior Proceedings In May 1997, Strougo commenced the first captioned action asserting six causes of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.