Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 FSUPP3D 181 - Krys v. Aaron

Krys v. Aaron’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
November 2016
most recently cited

4 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Brown v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority · Williams v. Illinois · Laborers' International Union v. Foster Wheeler Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the line between permissible testimony on ultimate issues and an impermissible legal opinion”). As a result, the Court finds this aspect of Mr, Leshner's opinion inadmissible. . Defendant mounts no specific challenge to Mr. Leshner’s qualifications, nor to the general "fit”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.