Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 Ga. App. 813 - Greenlee v. Chastain

112 Ga. App. 813 - Greenlee v. Chastain’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2004

3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

7019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eubanks v. Mullis · Bach v. Bragg Bros. & Blackwell Inc. · 100 Ga. App. 38 - Hardwick v. Georgia Power Co. · 66 Ga. App. 363 - English v. Georgia Power Co. · Brown v. Sanders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The charge did not authorize the jury to find that the plaintiff had yielded her superior right of way merely by the giv ing of the turn signal, for the charge included the requirement that the jury must find that the plaintiff approached the intersection with the “right turn signal on; that is operating, and indicated to the defendant that she was going to make a right turn.” Such charge requires an additional element, e.g. slowing speed, extreme right hand side of the road, etc. Had the plaintiff desired or felt that additional instructions defining how the plaintiff might have “indicated” to the defendant her intention to yield the right of way the assignment of error should be on such ground and not on the correct charge given.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where a driver on a favored or through highway signals an intention to make a right turn, a driver on the disfavored roadway, and to the first driver’s right, may proceed to cross the favored roadway, since the favored driver has indicated an intention to yield the right of way to cross in front of the other.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.