Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 Idaho 459 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 1993
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Behrens · State v. Wolfe · Quick v. Crane · Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc. · State v. Ditmars

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[H]ow can we truly say that the trial court has not abused its discretion when we do not know the reasons for its ruling on the new trial'motions? How can we state that the trial judge correctly applied the standard for each new trial motion when all he tells us is that he grants or denies them based on this or that rule?” [Quick, supra,] at 771 , 727 P.2d at 1199 . Williams, supra, 112 Idaho at 461 , 732 P.2d at 699 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.