112 Ind. App. 605 - Gandy v. Orr, Administrator’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1995
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Carter v. Aetna Life Insurance · Deeter v. Burk · Stalker v. Breeze · Stewart v. Smith · Krom v. Vermillion
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Certificates * * * purporting to be under seal and signature of such notary public, shall be received as presumptive evidence of the official character of such instrument and of the facts therein set forth." _... This certificate, authenticated by the notary, was prima facie evidence of the execution of the contract. Krom et al. v. Vermillion, 1895, 143 Ind. 75 , 41 N.E. 539 . The certificate being merely presumptive evidence, the presumption disappears upon evidence to the contrary. State ex rel. Winslow v. Fisher, 1941, 109 Ind.App. 644 , 37 N.E.(2d) 280. But until this presumption is rebutted it stands in favor of one having the burden of proof on the question of execution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mullins v. State“Certificates * * * purporting to be under seal and signature of such notary public, shall be received as presumptive evidence of the official character of such instrument and of the facts therein set forth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mullins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.