Smith v. Shaver’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 1990
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moore v. McPherson · Schultz v. Stiner · Sigler v. Phares · Case v. Cherokee Lanyon Spelter Co. · Howard v. Tourbier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That the right to the rents and profits of property foreclosed and sold is in the execution debtor during the redemption period has always been recognized. (Citing cases.) Such right of redemption cannot be subjected to forced sale, nor can the debtor be dispossessed or deprived of the fruits of possession during that interval, and the necessary corollary thereto is that the debtor’s interest cannot otherwise be abridged of impaired without his free assent.” (p. 791.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The defendant owner may redeem any real property sold under . . . order of sale ... at any time within eighteen months . . . and shall in the meantime be entitled to the possession of the property . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Aley v. Schroeder““If these privileges may be abridged or taken from him by any order or process in invitum, then the redemption period becomes a useless superfluity and the right of redemption a vain thing.” (p. 793.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.