State v. Hauser’s Empirical Analysis
1904
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently December 1970 · most notably State v. Hudson (1969), State v. Ash (1970)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Carll · Crescent City Live Stock & Slaughter-House Co. v. Larrieux · State v. De Hart · State v. Kline · State v. Hobgood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When an averment is imperfect, but is of such a nature that the verdict could not have been returned unless evidence of the matter not averred had been given, the defect in the indictment is said to be cured by the verdict, and ■cannot be taken advantage of in arrest of judgment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Bills of exception should be presented and signed before appeal. The court is without authority to sign them later.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Butler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.