112 Md. App. 148 - Howard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited
30 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Chimel v. California · Ornelas v. United States · Johnson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] police officer may arrest a person without a warrant if the officer has probable cause to believe: (1) That an offense listed in subsection (f) of this section has been committed; (2) That the person has committed the offense; and (3) That unless the person is immediately arrested: (i) The person may not be apprehended; (ii) The person may cause injury to the person or damage to the property of one or more other persons; or (iii) The person may tamper with, dispose of, or destroy evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.