Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 MISC2D 429 - Catherine H. v. James S.

Catherine H. v. James S.’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1983
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court deems the authorized use by the Courts of these current blood testing procedures to be in recognition that the utilization of these sophisticated tests enhances the ability of a Court to more accurately adjudicate these matters.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.