People v. Kelsey’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 1984
most recently cited
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a general proposition, local laws and general state laws are not inconsistent when the local law does not prohibit what the state law permits nor allow what the state law forbids____ An exception to this general principle occurs when the legislature specifically and in clear and specific terms permits regulation by local authorities in a field occupied by the state____ The courts have consistently held that where the exten sion of the principle of a state law by means of a local law results in a situation where what would be permissible under the state law becomes a'violation of the local law, the latter law is unauthorized ____ When the state has surveyed the field and set up standards which are proper, these standards may not be made more vigorous or extensive by local authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.