Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 MISS 365 - Martin v. State

Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2018

15 state decisions

4019161920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rester v. State · Johnson v. State · Echols v. State · Strickland v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “disregard any portion of the evidence either for the state or for the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.