Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 NEB 675 - Dougherty v. White

Dougherty v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
7
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2021

23 state decisions

7019241930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Palmer v. Sawyer · Galligher v. Smiley · Best v. Zutavern · Dorrington v. Myers · Rakes v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We think a fair construction of our statute, above quoted, in view of the decisions of this and other courts, requires that the revivor should be against the representatives of the deceased person whose property rights would be affected by the revivor. If the revivor would affect only the personal property in the hands of the administrator, then it may be revived as against him, but, if it is intended to affect real property which passed, on the death of the judgment debtor, to his heirs, then it should be revived against such heirs at law, and, if the judgment is to affect, or does affect, both personalty and real estate, then it should be revived against both the personal representatives and the heirs. In the instant case, the revivor was not against the heirs at law of Mahon, and yet it was the real property which descended to them that is sought to be affected and taken under the execution, and under a judgment to which they were not a party and of which they had no legal notice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It would be a strange rule that where the husband died, leaving a wife surviving, she could take the property for her lifetime, and then his heirs would take it, absolutely free from debt, and because he left no spouse surviving, they would be cut off from any right to the homestead. Such is not the intention of the statute.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Upon the death of a defendant in an action, wherein the right, or any part thereof, survives against his personal representative, the revivor shall be against him; and it may also be against the heirs or devisees of the defendant, or both, when the right of action, or any part thereof, survives against them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.