Valerio v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McGuire v. United States · Lozada v. State · Warden, Nevada State Prison v. Lyons · Kills on Top v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of reviewing errors of constitutional dimension which appear on the face of the record irrespective of the doctrines of procedural default and waiver, the [Nevada] district court erred in failing to address the merits of Valerio's claim and should be reversed. 161 We note at the outset that reversal of the district court's order for its failure to recognize this court's”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Valerio v. Crawford“A second or successive petition must be dismissed if ... new or different grounds are alleged, [and] the judge or justice finds that the failure of the petitioner to assert those grounds in a prior petition constituted an abuse of the writ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Valerio v. Crawford“A second or successive petition must be dismissed if the judge or justice determines that it fails to allege new or different grounds for relief and that the prior determination was on the merits....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Valerio v. Crawford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.