Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 N.J. 454 - State v. Rose

State v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

188
cited by 188 later decisions
4
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

183 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 188 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably State v. Marshall (1991), State v. Zola (1988)

183 state decisions

11901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ramseur · State v. MacOn · State v. Koedatich · State v. Bey · State v. Zola

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 188 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a person firing a sawed-off shotgun into the abdomen of another at point-blank range necessarily is aware that `it is practically certain' that such conduct will cause the victim's death.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. State v. Rose · 287 N.J. Super. 76 - State v. Loftin
  2. “low threshold ... for permitting a charge on a lesser-included offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. 252 N.J. Super. 155 - State v. Mendez · 255 N.J. Super. 435 - State v. Darrian
  3. “of the victim, was encompassed in the aggravating factor of c(4)(d). Hence, the inference that the incorporation of c(4)(c) into c(4)(d) served to increase the weight accorded to (c)(4)(d) cannot be dispelled. The Court has acknowledged the potential for prejudice in such overlapping factors based merely on the same evidence, but has determined that this can be cured by a limiting instruction to the jury that will”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. State v. Di Frisco

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.