Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 N.M. 193 - State v. Mares

State v. Mares’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Bernal (2006), State v. Gonzales (1992)

48 state decisions

2201991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Testan · State v. Sutphin · Herron v. State · United States v. Finkelstein · Beaudine v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]erhaps retrial would be indicated, so the issue could be decided by the fact finder under proper instructions. Herron , however, did not address that issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.