Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 N.M. 291 - Romero v. State

Romero v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. Delgado · 7 Cal. 3d 318 - Cameron v. State of California · California First Bank v. State · Jewell v. Seidenberg · Cervantes v. Forbis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who, without negligence on his part, is suddenly and unexpectedly confronted with peril, arising from either the actual presence or the appearance of an imminent danger to himself or another, is not expected nor required to use the same judgment and prudence that is required of him in the exercise of ordinary care in calmer and more deliberate moments. His duty is to exercise only the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in the same situation. If, at that moment, he does what appears to him to be the best thing to do and if his choice and manner of action are the same as might have been followed by any reasonably prudent person under the same conditions, then he has done all that the law requires of him, even though, in the light of after events, it might appear that a different course would have been better and safer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A passenger has a duty to use ordinary care for his own safety. A passenger may not sit idly by and permit himself to be driven carelessly, to his injury, where there are dangers which are known to him or which reasonably should be known to him. If you find that circumstances existed in this case which would cause a passenger, exercising ordinary care for his own safety, to keep a lookout or warn the driver, and that the plaintiff failed to do so, then such failure is negligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`duties in the operation' does not encompass a duty to supervise the operation through regulation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.