Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 N.M. 449 - State v. Vann Sutton

State v. Vann Sutton’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably State v. Gomez (1997), State v. Hodge (1994)

40 state decisions

280199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Boyd v. United States · Michigan v. Long · Oliver v. United States · Hester v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At common law, the curtilage is the area to which extends the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of life, and therefore has been considered part of [the] home itself for Fourth Amendment purposes. Thus, courts have extended Fourth Amendment protection to the curtilage; and they have defined the curtilage, as did the common law, by reference to the factors that determine whether an individual reasonably may expect that an area immediately adjacent to the home will remain private.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “have evolved in areas with very different customs and terrain. In New Mexico [and in Idaho] lot sizes in rural areas are often large, and land is still plentiful. Our interpretation and application of the state constitution must take into account the possibility that such differences in custom and terrain gave rise to particular expectations of privacy when the state constitution was adopted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “References to the state constitution, without some discussion or argument concerning the scope of its protections, are not enough to alert the trial court to the issue of a possible difference between the rights afforded by the state constitution and those provided by the fourth amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.