Clark v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
56 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably State v. Torres (1999), State v. Elinski (1997)
56 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Perea v. Baca · State v. Day · State v. Trujillo · Arizona Public Service Co. v. O'CHESKY · State v. Lopez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because our harmless-error analysis instructs that error may be prejudicial with respect to one conviction, but harmless with respect to another, we review the effect of [codefendant's] statement with respect to each conviction separately.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lopez“It is clear, we think, that 'wherever authority is given to sign the name of another to a writing, there can be no forgery.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Candelaria
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.