Cantrell v. W & C Contracting Co., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 1994
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc. · Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight) · Hales v. Van Cleave · Blake v. Blake · Reed v. Fish Engineering Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cannot properly be entered in general, without identifying the specific discovery sought or individuals or entities to be deposed, and a determination by the court that the specific discovery or deposition requested will probably be material to the cause. Soliz v. Bright Star Enters., 104 N.M. 202, 204 , 718 P.2d 1350, 1352 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 104 N.M. 191 , 718 P.2d 701 (1986). Given the fact that the Family has not complied with the basic requirements of the Notice of Claims Statute, this discovery argument seems more like a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.