Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 N.M. 723 - State v. Chamberlain

State v. Chamberlain’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

169
cited by 169 later decisions
7
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

165 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 169 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Woodward (1995), State v. Hernandez (1993)

165 state decisions

7001991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · Edwards v. Arizona · Berkemer v. McCarty · Oregon v. Mathiason

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 169 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The prosecution is allowed reasonable latitude in closing argument. The district court has wide discretion to control closing argument, and there is no error absent an abuse of discretion or prejudice to defendant. . . . The question on appeal is whether the argument served to deprive defendant of a fair trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The court is not permitted to interfere with the jury's discretion to deliberate.... [T]he approach taken by a jury in reaching a decision should not be called into question. We agree with the policy that discourages, and in most instances prohibits, any inquiry or intrusion into the jury room.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In deciding every case, jurors must necessarily take into consideration their knowledge and impressions founded upon experience in their everyday walks of life, and the fact that these things affect them in reaching their verdict cannot be reversible error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.