112 Ohio App. 3d 1 - State v. Sheets’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

48 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[w]hoever violates division (A) of section 959.13 of the Revised Code is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree. In addition, the court may order the offender to forfeit the animal or livestock and may provide for its disposition, including, but not limited to, the sale of the animal or livestock. If an animal or livestock is forfeited and sold pursuant to this division, the proceeds from the sale first shall be applied to pay the expenses incurred with regard to the care of the animal from the time it was taken from the custody of the former owner. The balance of the proceeds from the sale, if any, shall be paid to the former owner of the animal.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Hale, Unpublished Decision (12-23-2005) · State v. Walker, Unpublished Decision (10-21-2005)

2. “doctrine, first enunciated by Justice Holmes in Hester v. United States (1924), 265 U.S. 57 , 59 , 44 S.Ct. 445 , 446 , 68 L.Ed. 898 , 900 , provides that one does not have a legitimate expectation of privacy in open fields beyond the curtilage. Oliver v. United States (1984), 466 U.S. 170 , 178 , 104 S.Ct. 1735 , 1741 , 80 L.Ed.2d 214 , 224 . Curtilage is the area immediately surrounding a dwelling. United States v. Dunn (1987), 480 U.S. 294 , 300 , 107 S.Ct. 1134 , 1139 , 94 L.Ed.2d 326 , 334 . Factors to consider in pinpointing curtilage are”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Morrison, Unpublished Decision (10-22-2004)

3. “[i]n determining whether a condition of probation is related to the `interests of doing justice, rehabilitating the offender, and insuring his good behavior,' courts should consider whether the condition (1) is reasonably related to rehabilitating the offender, (2) has some relationship to the crime of which the offender was convicted, and (3) relates to conduct which is criminal or reasonably related to future criminality and serves the statutory ends of probation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Walker, Unpublished Decision (10-21-2005)