112 Ohio App. 3d 124 - State v. Grinnell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

20 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Id. at 131 . {¶ 39} Based on the foregoing, we conclude that appellant was not prejudiced by the exclusion of Warden Jackson's and Trooper Landis' testimony at the hearing on his motion to discharge the indictment, and his due process rights were not violated. Appellant's original trial date of November 6, 2006 was within 270 days of the date of his August 21, 2006 *Page 12 indictment on the felonious assault charge. 3 Accordingly, appellant's first assignment of error is overruled. {¶ 40} Assignment of Error No. 2: {¶ 41}”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Clark, Ca2007-03-037 (10-6-2008)

2. “'Duress consists of any conduct which overpowers a person's will and coerces or constrains his performance of an act which he otherwise would not have performed. Consequently, one who, under the pressure of a threat from another person, commits what would otherwise be a crime may, under certain circumstances, be justified in committing the act and not be guilty of the crime.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Diggs

3. “In reviewing the trial court's admission or exclusion of evidence, [an appellate court] must limit its review to whether the trial court's decision was unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Matter of A.E., 07ap-685 (3-25-2008)