Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 Ohio App. 3d 219 - State v. Rittenhour

112 Ohio App. 3d 219 - State v. Rittenhour’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia · Stanley v. Georgia · State v. Cyrus · City of Toledo v. Reasonover

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, there is no abuse in discretion when the sentence is authorized by statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.