Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 Ohio App. 3d 659 - State v. Lopez

112 Ohio App. 3d 659 - State v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2020

9 state decisions

601996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Watson · State v. Douglas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The juvenile court enjoys wide latitude in determining whether to relinquish jurisdiction of the juvenile, and its ultimate decision will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he safety of the community may require that the child be placed under legal restraint, including, if necessary, for the period extending beyond the child's majority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.