112 Ohio App. 3d 688 - State v. Self’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2022
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Bagley · State v. Jenks · State v. Xie · State v. Bridgeman · State v. Combs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n the absence of any showing of * * * prejudice to appellant, we cannot say - 18 - Warren CA2016-07-065 CA2016-07-066 that the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant's discovery motions”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Alhashimi“`Substantial' is a synonym of `material,' which is defined as `being of real importance or great consequence.' Webster's Third New International Dictionary (1981 Ed.) 1392, 2280.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Newspaper articles are generally inadmissible as evidence of the facts stated within the article because they are hearsay not within any exception.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.